•  
  • Archives for open data (5)

Filed under: ‘There’s an app for that!’: DinerInspect app uses restaurant inspection reports

Categories: Uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments
Published on: September 21, 2010

Software developer wins Edmonton app competition

DinerInspect app has restaurant inspection reports

EDMONTON — Software developer Mitch Ronquillo has taken the guesswork out of where to dine or not to dine in Edmonton by creating an application that displays restaurant inspection reports on a map.
Ronquillo’s DinerInspect app was selected as the gold winner in the City of Edmonton’s Apps4Edmonton contest. DinerInspect was one of 32 data applications and 86 app ideas generated by the contest.

Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/technology/Software+developer+wins+Edmonton+competition/3531077/story.html#ixzz10Bb26xGo

Publication No. 2010-14E Government 2.0 and Access to Information: 1. Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in Canada (15 April 2010)

Categories: Uncategorized
Comments: No Comments
Published on: September 20, 2010
Publication No. 2010-14E

Government 2.0 and Access to Information: 1. Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in Canada

Alysia Davies Dara Lithwick Legal and Legislative Affairs Division Parliamentary Information and Research Service Library of Parliament
15 April 2010
PDF (247 Kb, 12 pages)

1 Introduction

With the advent of new technologies that make document distribution on the Internet cheaper and easier than ever before, many governments are shifting to an “e-democracy” model of access to information. In addition to operating the traditional request-based system where a member of the public asks for a government document and receives a hard copy (or an electronic one), increasingly, governments are moving many of their documents and data online, where members of the public can search for material themselves. This process is often referred to as “proactive disclosure.” It is one component of a larger initiative sometimes called “e-government,” “e-governance,” “e-participation,” or “open government,” whereby citizens are able not only to obtain electronic access to government documents and services, but also to interact with them and give feedback on matters ranging from individual service problems to statistics and policy. Another term frequently used in this context is “Government 2.0,” which refers to the integration of new-generation digital media technologies into government structure and operations.1 Many municipal and local governments, including some in Canada, have started rolling out “open data” web portals that provide raw government data to the public. The governments of the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia all made major announcements regarding the launch of open data and other proactive disclosure initiatives in December 2009.2 Some countries, such as Mexico, India, Finland and New Zealand have had proactive disclosure systems in place for some time.3 This paper will provide examples of the proactive disclosure systems that are developing or already in place in Canada. A second paper in this series will look at the development of proactive disclosure systems in the United States and selected other countries.4

FULL PAPER: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-14-e.htm

Enhanced by Zemanta

Macleans: Is public data the future of governance?

Categories: Uncategorized
Tags:
Comments: No Comments
Published on: September 20, 2010

Is public data the future of governance?

How free information can make government more accountable and transparent
by Aaron Wherry on Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:00pm - 13 Comments
PHOTOGRAPH BY SIMON HAYTER
Garbage day in Vancouver is complicated. Because the schedule shifts each time a holiday occurs, your assigned day for pickup regularly changes. And because your assigned day regularly changes, it is easy to forget when you’re to put your refuse at the curb.
A little more than a year ago, David Eaves, a fresh-faced and effusive public policy activist, speculated on his blog that there had to be a way, perhaps something like an iPhone app, to make it easier to keep track.
He speculated one could, using public data from the city, establish a service that would eliminate forgetfulness and help make the city cleaner, healthier and more efficient. Two Vancouver computer programmers—Luke Closs and Kevin Jones—took up the project and within a few months, VanTrash was launched. A year later, 3,000 people use the free service to either update calendars on their computers or BlackBerries, or receive email reminders of approaching garbage days.
This, in its own way, might be the future of governance. A future in which the principles of free information, collaboration and connection allow citizens—and perhaps businesses as well—to provide what government does now in more efficient, useful ways. “You have information that in the hands of other people can become valuable,” explains Eaves. “That’s VanTrash. We can augment and extend what it is that you do.
And we can do it in simpler, cheaper and clever ways.” At the essence of theories like open data and open government is the belief that when information—from garbage routes to data on the efficiency of government services—is widely accessible, government is not only more accountable and transparent, but citizens are empowered to engage in public policy and create their own solutions.

Group calls on Montreal to join open-data movement

Categories: Uncategorized
Comments: No Comments
Published on: August 31, 2010

Group calls on Montreal to join open-data movement

Everything from crime stats to garbage-collection times should be available to public, Montréal ouverte says

By Jason Magder, The Gazette August 23, 2010 MONTREAL

- A group of citizens is pushing Montreal to join a worldwide movement to make its information accessible to all citizens.

The group, Montréal ouvert, was started by Michael Lenczner, co-founder of Île sans fil, a free wireless service, and three other Montreal entrepreneurs: Jean-Noé Landry, Sébastien Pierre and Jonathan Brun.

They hope to create a public campaign to mount what the founders call “gentle pressure” on the city to make more information public, and to make that information more accessible. The group says Montreal should join what’s called the open-data movement – a commitment by government bodies to allow free use of information collected using public funds, with the exception of any personal data.

Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/Group+calls+Montreal+join+open+data+movement/3433096/story.html#ixzz0yBUWXcns

Enhanced by Zemanta

Projet Montreal wants documents public

Categories: Uncategorized
Comments: No Comments
Published on: August 27, 2010

5x4 panorama of Montreal City Hall with a Cano...Image via Wikipedia Projet Montreal wants documents public

Friday, August 27, 2010

The Gazette

MONTREAL- Genieau, the consortium that lost Montreal’s $355.8-million water-management contract, says it hasn’t decided whether it will fight the city to keep it from making parts of its $34-million claim for the cancellation of the controversial contract public.

Opposition party Projet Montreal filed an access to information request with the city to see the bills and other documents that Genieau submitted with its claim last month.

The city clerk’s office, which handles access requests, wrote to the party yesterday saying that certain documents are confidential, including contracts Genieau had signed with subcontractors. The city clerk’s office also said it thinks the company’s summary invoices, covering assorted supplies of goods or services, should be public.

Genieau has 15 days to file an appeal with Quebec’s access to information commission to try to keep the invoices secret.

FULL ARTICLE: http://www.montrealgazette.com/mobile/iphone/story.html?id=3448652

Enhanced by Zemanta
page 1 of 1
The overarching purpose of access to information legislation … is to facilitate democracy. It does so in two related ways. It helps to ensure first, that citizens have the information required to participate meaningfully in the democratic process, and secondly, that politicians and bureaucrats remain accountable to the citizenry. - Gerard LaForest, former Supreme Court of Canada Justice, in Dagg vs. Canada (1997)
Membership and Support
Show your support. Become a member.
Visit The Shop
Follow RTKNS
FacebookLinkedInTwitterRSS
Welcome , today is Friday, May 18, 2012